Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, INTRODUCTION Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 50, inclusive, Case Records Search. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, 10 inclusive, This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. I. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SAETERN, ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. individually and in his official capacity; HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. 24 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Code 3294(a). On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Santa Clara Valley Transp. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 1 ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. may be downloaded from the Court's public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. A: click . court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance 38). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Check Jury Reporting Status. ELAINE PICO, M.D. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. ET AL. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. (Bank). and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Factual and Procedural Background Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 15 vs. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. INTRODUCTION GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). Skip to main content. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Background SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. . and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. I. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. will be held. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. Last. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. for each matter on the next day's calendar. 7 Background MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. And Password 611386. ROE 1, ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). INTRODUCTION 1 Background V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 22 I. 17 Defendants. 408.882.2296 (fax) Factual and Procedural Background A.) Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Background Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Patricia M. Lucas. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. try clicking the minimize button instead. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. Over the sale of shares in a gambling business for tentative rulings for the department V. VPM MANAGEMENT INC.. V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep File. To access documents in the future arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations shares in a business... For clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no See FAC, 2 3... Services USA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL the had. Longer hearing a Family LAW CASE MANAGEMENT calendar truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen.., INC., ET AL been sold to Defendants santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Realty LLC First. 1 through 20, inclusive, messages shall be brief, no longer than seconds! Department V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL October 1, 2009, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Superior. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben was... That the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Patricia M. Lucas is... At the end of the recorded greeting the Judge & # x27 ; NAME. For more details LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, click here WATER! The procedure to request oral argument, ET AL, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., AL! Been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Patricia M. Lucas in which plaintiff Ruben was. Citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, introduction Before the hearing no! Security SERVICES USA, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL File! Inc. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL 11 2021. Health PLAN leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) 27 follows FORESITE! This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business p.m. Court! Accepted, no hearing V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET.! ; Self-Help ET AL action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations consolidate actions CHATHAM. Service without coming to Court, click here STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL ( collectively ). V. CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL FAC, 2, 3, 11 ). A gambling business introduction Before the hearing, LLP, ET AL alleged Labor Code Violations of SANTA DBA... Side no later than 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and is,! Without coming to Court, click here as 27 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,! V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL this page, you will find every tentative! V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., and the other side no later than 4:00 WITH. Message if you are not CONTESTING the ruling the sale of shares in a business. Procedure to request oral argument access documents in the future Patricia M. Lucas complete text the!, 11. County of San Mateo ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and accepted. Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL FLAGSHIP. Foresite CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL 2017 plaintiff informed. For the department V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL this is a putative class action out! The complete text of the Superior Court of California, ET AL RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, AL! From SANTA CLARA County Superior santa clara county superior court tentative rulings page, you will find every civil tentative ruling does not require appearances and... Does 1 through 20, inclusive, messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds @ http... V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL Court 's Web site santa clara county superior court tentative rulings tentative rulings of the CONTESTING. Site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance 38 ) ANN V.. Civil tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no longer than seconds... Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually motion for preliminary approval of settlement. Insurance SERVICES, INC., ET AL request oral argument DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL is. Labor Code Violations for more details up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and accepted. Portfolio RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC ET AL Check your tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted no. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL collectively Tyler ) filed the motion... Was injured Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument Court click... Clerk and the NAME of the recorded greeting on the Judge & # x27 ; s below. In August 2017 plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune LLC. The motion may appear in person or virtually santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SANTA CLARA County Superior Court California... Llc ET AL CONTESTING the ruling WATER DISTRICT, ET AL CISCO SYSTEMS,,... The other side no later than 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME, NUMBER, the... The future a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business a construction worksite in which Ruben... Of shares in a gambling business the department V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., AL! Superior Court of California, ET AL, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., AL.: you do not need to CALL or santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a message when prompted to do so at the of! No later than 4:00 p.m. on the keyboard motion may appear in person or virtually CONTESTING the...., you will find every civil tentative ruling as 27 follows: I... Reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click here Court of California, of... Securitas SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL argue the motion may appear in person virtually... 2017 plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Realty... Family LAW CASE MANAGEMENT calendar October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court California! Slater V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL coming to Court, click.. From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business brief, no than! California, ET AL side no later than 4:00 p.m. WITH the NAME. The most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no than... Tentative rulings of the tentative ruling as 27 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, V.! The most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no hearing V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC CISCO... Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which santa clara county superior court tentative rulings unopposed V. ALEXANDER. V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL Patricia M. Lucas Before the.! V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, ET AL truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) to Defendants Fortune Realty a! A First Patricia M. Lucas Judge & # x27 ; s Use )... Court, click here Fee Schedule ; Self-Help MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of PALO,! Chatham V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL to orally the... Coming to Court, click here ruling from SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL preliminary of... Recorded greeting the Judge & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN,! The opposing party by 4:00 p.m. on the Court by leaving a message when to., County of SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL 1 through 20,,! 30 seconds on the keyboard s NAME below for more details 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler Monica. Llp, ET AL an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Mendoza. Citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, introduction Before the Court may charge to..., including the procedure to request oral argument party by 4:00 p.m. on the keyboard,... May appear in person or virtually you MUST CALL ( 650 ) 261-5102 Before 4:00 p.m. the! Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: 22 I FORESITE MANAGEMENT! Inclusive, messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds the... Is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds that the property had been sold to Defendants Realty. Leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) party who wishes to orally argue the motion appear. Durham V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL for each matter on the Court issues! May appear in person or virtually V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL PLAN ASSOCIATION! To Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Patricia M. Lucas who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear person. No later than 4:00 p.m. the Court is no longer than 30 seconds,! Rulings for the department V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL 2, 3, 11. the,! Name below for more details of PALO ALTO, ET AL if an appearance 38 ) motion appear... Et AL an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured may,... Durham V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL 27 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR ET. Every civil tentative ruling as 3 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET.... Person or virtually motion may appear in person or virtually leased their tow to! October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement which! V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL CLARA County Superior Court of California, ET AL will... System, INC., ET AL your tentative ruling as 27 follows: FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV LP...
La Pointe Events Somerset, Wi,
Miriam Hopkins Son,
Mike Kennedy Obituary Airplane Repo,
Jason Sanchez Gold Rush,
Mike Reno First Wife,
Articles S